Basketball
Should the NCAA basketball tournament be expanded to allow more teams?
My feeling is no. There are always going to be teams that feel like they deserved to get in, but didn't. This year in particular, there weren't very many that actually deserved to get in that got shut out.
Public Comments
- absolutely not
- Unless you allow them all, there are always going to be people complaining. You've got to draw the line somewhere. I can remember when it was 16 and then 32 teams. 64 teams is fine. Pretty soon the regular season will be meaningless.
- No not at all. Bob Knight was talking about that yesterday. It doesn't make a lick of sense.
- i think what they should do is do away with the mid majors getting an automatic bid like UTA,american,austin peay....let the panel decide if ariz st should get in instead or VT
- yes..to many damn idiots determing what teams get in and they end up picking the ones that don't deserve it
- They definitely should not expand the field. The next expansion would have to be to 128 teams. That would be ridiculous. It would start to look like college football where everyone gets to play a bowl game. The reason March Madness is special is because not everyone gets in. You have to actually earn your spot.
- I will say they need to do something about this idiotic "field of 65." Make it a "field of 68" with FOUR play-in games, but to just have one is ridiculous.
